i
have just finished this book during the weekend, so here's a very brief review.
i personally really liked the novel, but i do realize it is not for everybody.
it is a very hard sci-fi; a welcome break from the author's grand sprawling
space operas (though those are definitely worth a look as well). one could
almost say that "voyage" is not a sci-fi, rather a non-fiction
account of the post-apollo manned space exploration in an alternate history.
characterization
is halfway decent: the characters are not one-dimensional, but i would hardly
call them complex, evolving personalities. where this novel really shines is
the narrative and the details. the story opens with the launch of the final
component of the manned mission to mars. the following chapters are a
chronological description of the titular voyage, interspaced with flashback
chapters of events leading up to the launch, starting from the apollo 11 moon
landing. i found this narrative structure to be quite engaging, even though it
does take some of the suspense away (eg. we find out which astronauts were
selected for the mars mission from the first page). some of the flashback
chapters are excerpts from presidential speeches (eg. an almost word-for-word
actual nixon speech), recommendations for congress or newspaper articles, thus
giving the novel the illusion of an authentic historical account.
to
fully enjoy the novel a brief familiarity with the real history of nasa, the
politics of the period and the basic workings of rockets is required; together
with the exquisite attention to detail and technical jargon this might be a
turn-off for many readers, even fans of the science fiction genre. for example,
two characters have a dialog going on for several paragraphs about some NERVA
tests, only to clarify what the acronym stands for later and never mention it
again in the many discussions about the engine throughout the book (a bit like
the custom of academic papers of specifying an acronym only when it is first
used in the text). later we are given a description of the workings of this
nuclear engine by a character and this can be completely baffling to a reader
who does not know what are turbopumps, combustion chambers or vernier
thrusters. the conversations between mission control and the astronauts also
contain a lot of technical jargon and it reminded me of the film "apollo
13" which used excerpts from the actual transcripts of the mission (still
my favorite space movie; so much better than "gravity"). All these
elements made the novel really enjoyable to me, but, again, it's not
everybody's cup of tea.
if
interested, you can look up a tube video of the mission (called ares mission to
mars: voyage) in the space vehicle simulator "orbiter"; be
warned though, the structure of the rocket contains spoilers for astute
observers familiar with 70s era hardware. there are also recreations of the
mission in "kerbal space program", of course.
2 comments:
I've read Flood by Baxter, and his well-researched, hard sci-fi is a welcome alternative to some more fantastic alternatives.
baxter also writes "fantastic alternatives" and i greatly enjoy those too, but, hard sci-fi is a rarer beast.
let me recommend you "guns of the south", by harry turtledove as a very well researched and believable (given the premise) alternate history.
Post a Comment